giteveryday man page on Kali

Man page or keyword search:  
man Server   9211 pages
apropos Keyword Search (all sections)
Output format
Kali logo
[printable version]

GITEVERYDAY(7)			  Git Manual			GITEVERYDAY(7)

NAME
       giteveryday - A useful minimum set of commands for Everyday Git

SYNOPSIS
       Everyday Git With 20 Commands Or So

DESCRIPTION
       Git users can broadly be grouped into four categories for the purposes
       of describing here a small set of useful command for everyday Git.

       ·   Individual Developer (Standalone) commands are essential for
	   anybody who makes a commit, even for somebody who works alone.

       ·   If you work with other people, you will need commands listed in the
	   Individual Developer (Participant) section as well.

       ·   People who play the Integrator role need to learn some more
	   commands in addition to the above.

       ·   Repository Administration commands are for system administrators
	   who are responsible for the care and feeding of Git repositories.

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPER (STANDALONE)
       A standalone individual developer does not exchange patches with other
       people, and works alone in a single repository, using the following
       commands.

       ·   git-init(1) to create a new repository.

       ·   git-log(1) to see what happened.

       ·   git-checkout(1) and git-branch(1) to switch branches.

       ·   git-add(1) to manage the index file.

       ·   git-diff(1) and git-status(1) to see what you are in the middle of
	   doing.

       ·   git-commit(1) to advance the current branch.

       ·   git-reset(1) and git-checkout(1) (with pathname parameters) to undo
	   changes.

       ·   git-merge(1) to merge between local branches.

       ·   git-rebase(1) to maintain topic branches.

       ·   git-tag(1) to mark a known point.

   Examples
       Use a tarball as a starting point for a new repository.

	       $ tar zxf frotz.tar.gz
	       $ cd frotz
	       $ git init
	       $ git add . (1)
	       $ git commit -m "import of frotz source tree."
	       $ git tag v2.43 (2)

	   1. add everything under the current directory.
	   2. make a lightweight, unannotated tag.

       Create a topic branch and develop.

	       $ git checkout -b alsa-audio (1)
	       $ edit/compile/test
	       $ git checkout -- curses/ux_audio_oss.c (2)
	       $ git add curses/ux_audio_alsa.c (3)
	       $ edit/compile/test
	       $ git diff HEAD (4)
	       $ git commit -a -s (5)
	       $ edit/compile/test
	       $ git diff HEAD^ (6)
	       $ git commit -a --amend (7)
	       $ git checkout master (8)
	       $ git merge alsa-audio (9)
	       $ git log --since='3 days ago' (10)
	       $ git log v2.43.. curses/ (11)

	   1. create a new topic branch.
	   2. revert your botched changes in curses/ux_audio_oss.c.
	   3. you need to tell Git if you added a new file; removal and
	   modification will be caught if you do git commit -a later.
	   4. to see what changes you are committing.
	   5. commit everything, as you have tested, with your sign-off.
	   6. look at all your changes including the previous commit.
	   7. amend the previous commit, adding all your new changes, using
	   your original message.
	   8. switch to the master branch.
	   9. merge a topic branch into your master branch.
	   10. review commit logs; other forms to limit output can be combined
	   and include -10 (to show up to 10 commits), --until=2005-12-10,
	   etc.
	   11. view only the changes that touch what’s in curses/ directory,
	   since v2.43 tag.

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPER (PARTICIPANT)
       A developer working as a participant in a group project needs to learn
       how to communicate with others, and uses these commands in addition to
       the ones needed by a standalone developer.

       ·   git-clone(1) from the upstream to prime your local repository.

       ·   git-pull(1) and git-fetch(1) from "origin" to keep up-to-date with
	   the upstream.

       ·   git-push(1) to shared repository, if you adopt CVS style shared
	   repository workflow.

       ·   git-format-patch(1) to prepare e-mail submission, if you adopt
	   Linux kernel-style public forum workflow.

       ·   git-send-email(1) to send your e-mail submission without corruption
	   by your MUA.

       ·   git-request-pull(1) to create a summary of changes for your
	   upstream to pull.

   Examples
       Clone the upstream and work on it. Feed changes to upstream.

	       $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/.../torvalds/linux-2.6 my2.6
	       $ cd my2.6
	       $ git checkout -b mine master (1)
	       $ edit/compile/test; git commit -a -s (2)
	       $ git format-patch master (3)
	       $ git send-email --to="person <email@example.com>" 00*.patch (4)
	       $ git checkout master (5)
	       $ git pull (6)
	       $ git log -p ORIG_HEAD.. arch/i386 include/asm-i386 (7)
	       $ git ls-remote --heads http://git.kernel.org/.../jgarzik/libata-dev.git (8)
	       $ git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/.../jgarzik/libata-dev.git ALL (9)
	       $ git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD (10)
	       $ git gc (11)

	   1. checkout a new branch mine from master.
	   2. repeat as needed.
	   3. extract patches from your branch, relative to master,
	   4. and email them.
	   5. return to master, ready to see what’s new
	   6. git pull fetches from origin by default and merges into the
	   current branch.
	   7. immediately after pulling, look at the changes done upstream
	   since last time we checked, only in the area we are interested in.
	   8. check the branch names in an external repository (if not known).
	   9. fetch from a specific branch ALL from a specific repository and
	   merge it.
	   10. revert the pull.
	   11. garbage collect leftover objects from reverted pull.

       Push into another repository.

	       satellite$ git clone mothership:frotz frotz (1)
	       satellite$ cd frotz
	       satellite$ git config --get-regexp '^(remote|branch)\.' (2)
	       remote.origin.url mothership:frotz
	       remote.origin.fetch refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
	       branch.master.remote origin
	       branch.master.merge refs/heads/master
	       satellite$ git config remote.origin.push \
			  +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/satellite/* (3)
	       satellite$ edit/compile/test/commit
	       satellite$ git push origin (4)

	       mothership$ cd frotz
	       mothership$ git checkout master
	       mothership$ git merge satellite/master (5)

	   1. mothership machine has a frotz repository under your home
	   directory; clone from it to start a repository on the satellite
	   machine.
	   2. clone sets these configuration variables by default. It arranges
	   git pull to fetch and store the branches of mothership machine to
	   local remotes/origin/* remote-tracking branches.
	   3. arrange git push to push all local branches to their
	   corresponding branch of the mothership machine.
	   4. push will stash all our work away on remotes/satellite/*
	   remote-tracking branches on the mothership machine. You could use
	   this as a back-up method. Likewise, you can pretend that mothership
	   "fetched" from you (useful when access is one sided).
	   5. on mothership machine, merge the work done on the satellite
	   machine into the master branch.

       Branch off of a specific tag.

	       $ git checkout -b private2.6.14 v2.6.14 (1)
	       $ edit/compile/test; git commit -a
	       $ git checkout master
	       $ git cherry-pick v2.6.14..private2.6.14 (2)

	   1. create a private branch based on a well known (but somewhat
	   behind) tag.
	   2. forward port all changes in private2.6.14 branch to master
	   branch without a formal "merging". Or longhand

	   git format-patch -k -m --stdout v2.6.14..private2.6.14 | git am -3
	   -k

       An alternate participant submission mechanism is using the git
       request-pull or pull-request mechanisms (e.g as used on GitHub
       (www.github.com) to notify your upstream of your contribution.

INTEGRATOR
       A fairly central person acting as the integrator in a group project
       receives changes made by others, reviews and integrates them and
       publishes the result for others to use, using these commands in
       addition to the ones needed by participants.

       This section can also be used by those who respond to git request-pull
       or pull-request on GitHub (www.github.com) to integrate the work of
       others into their history. An sub-area lieutenant for a repository will
       act both as a participant and as an integrator.

       ·   git-am(1) to apply patches e-mailed in from your contributors.

       ·   git-pull(1) to merge from your trusted lieutenants.

       ·   git-format-patch(1) to prepare and send suggested alternative to
	   contributors.

       ·   git-revert(1) to undo botched commits.

       ·   git-push(1) to publish the bleeding edge.

   Examples
       A typical integrator’s Git day.

	       $ git status (1)
	       $ git branch --no-merged master (2)
	       $ mailx (3)
	       & s 2 3 4 5 ./+to-apply
	       & s 7 8 ./+hold-linus
	       & q
	       $ git checkout -b topic/one master
	       $ git am -3 -i -s ./+to-apply (4)
	       $ compile/test
	       $ git checkout -b hold/linus && git am -3 -i -s ./+hold-linus (5)
	       $ git checkout topic/one && git rebase master (6)
	       $ git checkout pu && git reset --hard next (7)
	       $ git merge topic/one topic/two && git merge hold/linus (8)
	       $ git checkout maint
	       $ git cherry-pick master~4 (9)
	       $ compile/test
	       $ git tag -s -m "GIT 0.99.9x" v0.99.9x (10)
	       $ git fetch ko && for branch in master maint next pu (11)
		   do
		       git show-branch ko/$branch $branch (12)
		   done
	       $ git push --follow-tags ko (13)

	   1. see what you were in the middle of doing, if anything.
	   2. see which branches haven’t been merged into master yet. Likewise
	   for any other integration branches e.g.  maint, next and pu
	   (potential updates).
	   3. read mails, save ones that are applicable, and save others that
	   are not quite ready (other mail readers are available).
	   4. apply them, interactively, with your sign-offs.
	   5. create topic branch as needed and apply, again with sign-offs.
	   6. rebase internal topic branch that has not been merged to the
	   master or exposed as a part of a stable branch.
	   7. restart pu every time from the next.
	   8. and bundle topic branches still cooking.
	   9. backport a critical fix.
	   10. create a signed tag.
	   11. make sure master was not accidentally rewound beyond that
	   already pushed out.
	   12. In the output from git show-branch, master should have
	   everything ko/master has, and next should have everything ko/next
	   has, etc.
	   13. push out the bleeding edge, together with new tags that point
	   into the pushed history.

       In this example, the ko shorthand points at the Git maintainer’s
       repository at kernel.org, and looks like this:

	   (in .git/config)
	   [remote "ko"]
		   url = kernel.org:/pub/scm/git/git.git
		   fetch = refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/ko/*
		   push = refs/heads/master
		   push = refs/heads/next
		   push = +refs/heads/pu
		   push = refs/heads/maint

REPOSITORY ADMINISTRATION
       A repository administrator uses the following tools to set up and
       maintain access to the repository by developers.

       ·   git-daemon(1) to allow anonymous download from repository.

       ·   git-shell(1) can be used as a restricted login shell for shared
	   central repository users.

       ·   git-http-backend(1) provides a server side implementation of
	   Git-over-HTTP ("Smart http") allowing both fetch and push services.

       ·   gitweb(1) provides a web front-end to Git repositories, which can
	   be set-up using the git-instaweb(1) script.

       update hook howto[1] has a good example of managing a shared central
       repository.

       In addition there are a number of other widely deployed hosting,
       browsing and reviewing solutions such as:

       ·   gitolite, gerrit code review, cgit and others.

   Examples
       We assume the following in /etc/services

	       $ grep 9418 /etc/services
	       git	       9418/tcp		       # Git Version Control System

       Run git-daemon to serve /pub/scm from inetd.

	       $ grep git /etc/inetd.conf
	       git     stream  tcp     nowait  nobody \
		 /usr/bin/git-daemon git-daemon --inetd --export-all /pub/scm

	   The actual configuration line should be on one line.

       Run git-daemon to serve /pub/scm from xinetd.

	       $ cat /etc/xinetd.d/git-daemon
	       # default: off
	       # description: The Git server offers access to Git repositories
	       service git
	       {
		       disable = no
		       type	       = UNLISTED
		       port	       = 9418
		       socket_type     = stream
		       wait	       = no
		       user	       = nobody
		       server	       = /usr/bin/git-daemon
		       server_args     = --inetd --export-all --base-path=/pub/scm
		       log_on_failure  += USERID
	       }

	   Check your xinetd(8) documentation and setup, this is from a Fedora
	   system. Others might be different.

       Give push/pull only access to developers using git-over-ssh.
	   e.g. those using: $ git push/pull ssh://host.xz/pub/scm/project

	       $ grep git /etc/passwd (1)
	       alice:x:1000:1000::/home/alice:/usr/bin/git-shell
	       bob:x:1001:1001::/home/bob:/usr/bin/git-shell
	       cindy:x:1002:1002::/home/cindy:/usr/bin/git-shell
	       david:x:1003:1003::/home/david:/usr/bin/git-shell
	       $ grep git /etc/shells (2)
	       /usr/bin/git-shell

	   1. log-in shell is set to /usr/bin/git-shell, which does not allow
	   anything but git push and git pull. The users require ssh access to
	   the machine.
	   2. in many distributions /etc/shells needs to list what is used as
	   the login shell.

       CVS-style shared repository.

	       $ grep git /etc/group (1)
	       git:x:9418:alice,bob,cindy,david
	       $ cd /home/devo.git
	       $ ls -l (2)
		 lrwxrwxrwx   1 david git    17 Dec  4 22:40 HEAD -> refs/heads/master
		 drwxrwsr-x   2 david git  4096 Dec  4 22:40 branches
		 -rw-rw-r--   1 david git    84 Dec  4 22:40 config
		 -rw-rw-r--   1 david git    58 Dec  4 22:40 description
		 drwxrwsr-x   2 david git  4096 Dec  4 22:40 hooks
		 -rw-rw-r--   1 david git 37504 Dec  4 22:40 index
		 drwxrwsr-x   2 david git  4096 Dec  4 22:40 info
		 drwxrwsr-x   4 david git  4096 Dec  4 22:40 objects
		 drwxrwsr-x   4 david git  4096 Nov  7 14:58 refs
		 drwxrwsr-x   2 david git  4096 Dec  4 22:40 remotes
	       $ ls -l hooks/update (3)
		 -r-xr-xr-x   1 david git  3536 Dec  4 22:40 update
	       $ cat info/allowed-users (4)
	       refs/heads/master       alice\|cindy
	       refs/heads/doc-update   bob
	       refs/tags/v[0-9]*       david

	   1. place the developers into the same git group.
	   2. and make the shared repository writable by the group.
	   3. use update-hook example by Carl from Documentation/howto/ for
	   branch policy control.
	   4. alice and cindy can push into master, only bob can push into
	   doc-update. david is the release manager and is the only person who
	   can create and push version tags.

GIT
       Part of the git(1) suite

NOTES
	1. update hook howto
	   file:///usr/share/doc/git/html/howto/update-hook-example.html

Git 2.15.1			  12/23/2017			GITEVERYDAY(7)
[top]

List of man pages available for Kali

Copyright (c) for man pages and the logo by the respective OS vendor.

For those who want to learn more, the polarhome community provides shell access and support.

[legal] [privacy] [GNU] [policy] [cookies] [netiquette] [sponsors] [FAQ]
Tweet
Polarhome, production since 1999.
Member of Polarhome portal.
Based on Fawad Halim's script.
....................................................................
Vote for polarhome
Free Shell Accounts :: the biggest list on the net